This is a great counter/opposite view of “males as the original form”/the “Adam ” belief. There is also something to the woman-as-original-form in terms of asexual reproduction. From a biological perspective, it just makes sense that “woman” is the first to veer off from our ancestral asexual reproducing organism (the original sexuality/sex). She is the form lacking in only one piece of reproduction (sperm/fertilization), while the male form is lacking womb, egg, milk, etc.
I mean, I’m an English major making huge leaps here, I know, but that just makes sense to me. Tell me in the comments if I’m wrong/how I might have missed something.
If it’s chemical dependency you’re interested in, you might want to look into testosterone. TESS-TAHSS-TER-OWN!!- the most lethal substance on earth. And it does not come from a laboratory, it comes from the scrotum; a scotum located, interestingly enough, not far from the asshole. How fitting.
And, as it happens, all [the] male subcultures share a particular set of features: homophobia, coupled with an oddly ironic, complete, childlike trust in male authority. Men are attracted to powerful men. They also share a strong fear and dislike of women. This in spite of a pathological obsession with pussy. TESS-TAHSS-TER-OWN!!
So why are men like this? I think the overriding problem for men is that in life’s main event, reproduction, they’re left out; women do all the work. What do men contribute? Generally, they’re just looking for a quick parking space for some sperm. A couple of hits of hot jism, and…
View original post 158 more words